#VCaaS

Comment réinvestir 60% de son capital après un apport-cession en holding en 2024

Source : https://www.tudigo.co/media/analyses/150-0-b-ter

L'article 150-0 B ter du Code général des impôts (CGI) représente une avenue fiscale avantageuse pour les entrepreneurs qui cherchent à optimiser leur imposition sur les plus-values mobilières. Ce dispositif permet un report d'imposition lors de l'apport de titres d'une société à une holding, suivi par la cession de ces mêmes titres, sous condition de réinvestissement.

Mécanisme de l'Apport-Cession selon l'article 150-0 B ter

Ce mécanisme offre la possibilité de reporter l'imposition sur la plus-value générée par la vente de titres d'une entreprise, à condition que ces titres soient préalablement apportés à une holding. L'intérêt principal réside dans la capacité à différer la fiscalité et, sous certaines conditions, à réinvestir un montant supérieur dans des activités économiques ou des fonds de placement éligibles.

Conditions de Réinvestissement

Le cœur de cette stratégie repose sur l'obligation de réinvestir 60% du produit de la cession dans les deux ans suivant la vente, dans des activités ou des placements précisément définis par le législateur. Ce réinvestissement doit s'effectuer dans des secteurs d'activité éligibles qui contribuent à l'économie réelle, offrant ainsi une opportunité de croissance pour l'entreprise et l'économie en général.

Réinvestissements Éligibles

Les options de réinvestissement admissibles sous l'article 150-0 B ter sont diversifiées et incluent :

  • Le financement direct d'activités opérationnelles : Cela peut concerner le développement d'une nouvelle branche d'activité au sein de la holding ou le renforcement de ses activités existantes.

  • L'acquisition de titres d'entreprises opérationnelles : L'achat de titres d'autres entreprises opérationnelles, sous condition de contrôle ou sans contrôle, pour étendre le portefeuille d'activités de la holding.

  • La souscription à des parts de fonds de capital-investissement : Investir dans des fonds qui soutiennent financièrement des entreprises européennes, avec une obligation de détention minimale qui assure un engagement à long terme.

Avantages pour les Chefs d'Entreprise

En choisissant cette voie, les chefs d'entreprise peuvent significativement réduire leur charge fiscale immédiate sur la plus-value réalisée lors de la cession de leurs parts. Ce report d'imposition n'est pas seulement un avantage fiscal mais permet également de réinvestir dans des activités à forte valeur ajoutée, favorisant ainsi la croissance et le développement économique.

Cas Pratiques

Pour illustrer concrètement l'application de l'article 150-0 B ter, prenons l'exemple d'un entrepreneur qui, après avoir apporté et vendu ses titres via sa holding, a choisi de réinvestir dans un fonds de capital-investissement éligible. Cette démarche lui a permis non seulement de différer l'imposition sur la plus-value mais aussi de participer activement au financement de startups innovantes

Conclusion

L'article 150-0 B ter du CGI ouvre des perspectives intéressantes pour l'optimisation fiscale des plus-values mobilières à travers l'apport-cession. Il incite les entrepreneurs à réinvestir dans l'économie réelle, contribuant ainsi à leur croissance personnelle et au développement économique. Une consultation avec un expert est essentielle pour tirer le meilleur parti de cette stratégie, en alignant les intérêts fiscaux avec les objectifs de croissance et d'investissement.

Corporate Venture Capital: Balancing Financial Returns and Strategic Objectives

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) is a powerful strategy for driving innovation and strategic growth. However, balancing the pursuit of financial returns with achieving strategic objectives is a complex task that requires careful planning and execution. This article explores how CVC units can effectively balance these dual goals to maximize their impact.

Understanding the Dual Goals of CVC

  1. Financial Returns

    • Profit Generation: Like traditional venture capital, one of the primary goals of CVC is to generate financial returns from investments in high-potential startups.

    • Portfolio Diversification: Investing in a diverse range of startups helps mitigate risk and enhance the potential for high returns.

  2. Strategic Objectives

    • Innovation and Technology Acquisition: CVC allows corporations to access cutting-edge technologies and innovations that can be integrated into their operations.

    • Market Expansion: Investing in startups can open new markets and customer segments for the parent company.

    • Strategic Partnerships: CVC can foster strategic partnerships and collaborations that drive long-term growth and competitive advantage.

Strategies for Balancing Financial Returns and Strategic Objectives

  1. Clear Investment Thesis

    • Define Priorities: Clearly define the primary objectives of the CVC unit, whether it’s financial returns, strategic innovation, or a balanced approach. This helps in making consistent investment decisions.

    • Alignment with Corporate Strategy: Ensure that the investment thesis aligns with the overall corporate strategy and long-term goals of the parent company.

  2. Dual Evaluation Criteria

    • Financial Metrics: Evaluate potential investments using traditional financial metrics such as ROI, IRR, and market potential. This ensures the financial viability of the investments.

    • Strategic Metrics: Simultaneously assess the strategic fit of the startups, including their alignment with the company’s innovation goals, market expansion plans, and technology needs.

  3. Balanced Portfolio Approach

    • Diversification: Maintain a balanced portfolio of investments that includes both high-risk, high-reward startups and more stable, strategically aligned companies. This helps manage risk while pursuing strategic goals.

    • Stage Diversification: Invest in startups at different stages of development, from early-stage ventures with high growth potential to later-stage companies with proven technologies and market presence.

  4. Active Portfolio Management

    • Regular Reviews: Conduct regular reviews of the portfolio to assess the performance of each investment against both financial and strategic metrics.

    • Adapt and Pivot: Be prepared to adapt the investment strategy based on market changes, technological advancements, and shifts in corporate strategy. This includes divesting from underperforming investments and reallocating resources to high-potential opportunities.

  5. Strategic Collaboration and Integration

    • Integration Plans: Develop clear plans for integrating the technologies and innovations from portfolio companies into the parent company’s operations. This ensures that the strategic benefits are realized.

    • Collaborative Projects: Foster collaborative projects between the parent company and the startups to drive mutual growth and innovation. This can include joint product development, co-marketing initiatives, and technology sharing.

  6. Performance Metrics and KPIs

    • Financial KPIs: Track key financial performance indicators such as revenue growth, profitability, and exit multiples. These metrics provide insights into the financial health of the portfolio.

    • Strategic KPIs: Develop strategic KPIs to measure the impact of CVC investments on the parent company’s strategic goals. This can include metrics like technology adoption rates, market share growth, and innovation outcomes.

  7. Governance and Oversight

    • Strategic Committees: Establish strategic committees comprising senior executives and industry experts to oversee the CVC activities. These committees ensure that investments align with both financial and strategic objectives.

    • Transparent Reporting: Maintain transparent reporting and communication channels with stakeholders, including regular updates on the performance and strategic impact of the CVC portfolio.

Case Studies and Examples

  1. Google Ventures: Google Ventures (GV) is known for its balanced approach, investing in a wide range of sectors and stages. GV focuses on both financial returns and strategic alignment with Google’s innovation goals, resulting in successful investments in companies like Uber, Nest, and Slack.

  2. Intel Capital: Intel Capital invests in startups that align with Intel’s strategic focus areas, such as artificial intelligence, cybersecurity, and IoT. This dual focus has allowed Intel to drive innovation while achieving significant financial returns from its investments.

  3. Johnson & Johnson Innovation: Johnson & Johnson Innovation combines financial investments with strategic collaborations in the healthcare sector. Their CVC unit invests in startups that can complement and enhance Johnson & Johnson’s product portfolio and research capabilities.

Conclusion

Balancing financial returns and strategic objectives in Corporate Venture Capital requires a clear investment thesis, dual evaluation criteria, and a balanced portfolio approach. By actively managing the portfolio, fostering strategic collaborations, and tracking both financial and strategic KPIs, CVC units can maximize their impact and drive sustainable growth.

The success of a CVC program depends on its ability to align with the parent company’s broader strategic goals while delivering financial returns. By following the strategies and best practices outlined in this article, corporations can navigate the complexities of CVC and unlock its full potential, ensuring long-term success and competitive advantage in the market.

Navigating the Legal and Regulatory Landscape in Corporate Venture Capital

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) is a powerful tool for driving innovation and strategic growth. However, navigating the legal and regulatory landscape is crucial to ensure that investments are compliant and that potential risks are mitigated. This article explores the key legal and regulatory considerations for CVC units and provides best practices for managing these aspects effectively.

Key Legal and Regulatory Considerations

  1. Securities Regulations

    • Registration Requirements: Depending on the jurisdiction, certain securities offerings may need to be registered with regulatory authorities. Understanding these requirements helps avoid legal pitfalls and ensures compliance.

    • Accredited Investors: Many jurisdictions have specific rules regarding who can invest in private securities. Ensuring that all investors meet the criteria for accredited investors is essential for compliance.

    • Disclosure Obligations: Transparency is crucial in CVC transactions. Proper disclosure of material information to investors and stakeholders is necessary to comply with securities laws.

  2. Antitrust and Competition Laws

    • Market Power and Monopoly Concerns: Investments that significantly impact market dynamics may attract scrutiny from antitrust authorities. It’s important to evaluate the competitive implications of CVC investments.

    • Mergers and Acquisitions: When a CVC unit acquires a controlling interest in a startup, it may trigger merger control notifications or approvals. Understanding the thresholds and requirements in different jurisdictions is essential.

  3. Intellectual Property (IP) Rights

    • IP Due Diligence: Conduct thorough due diligence to assess the startup’s IP portfolio, including patents, trademarks, copyrights, and trade secrets. This ensures the startup has robust IP protection and avoids potential infringement issues.

    • IP Ownership and Licensing: Clearly define the ownership and licensing rights of IP developed during the collaboration. This includes ensuring that the parent company has the necessary rights to use and commercialize the IP.

  4. Contractual Agreements

    • Investment Agreements: Draft clear and comprehensive investment agreements that outline the terms and conditions of the investment, including funding, equity stakes, governance rights, and exit strategies.

    • Partnership Agreements: Establish partnership agreements that define the roles and responsibilities of each party, collaboration terms, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

    • Confidentiality and Non-Disclosure Agreements: Protect sensitive information through confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements (NDAs). These agreements help safeguard proprietary information and maintain competitive advantage.

  5. Regulatory Compliance

    • Industry-specific Regulations: Depending on the startup’s industry, there may be specific regulatory requirements to comply with. This includes regulations related to healthcare, finance, technology, and other sectors.

    • Data Privacy and Security: Ensure compliance with data privacy and security regulations, such as GDPR, CCPA, and other relevant laws. This is particularly important for startups handling sensitive customer data.

Best Practices for Managing Legal and Regulatory Aspects

  1. Engage Legal Experts

    • In-house Legal Team: Establish a dedicated in-house legal team with expertise in venture capital, securities law, IP, and regulatory compliance. This team can provide ongoing legal support and ensure compliance with relevant laws.

    • External Legal Advisors: Engage external legal advisors with specialized knowledge and experience in CVC transactions. They can provide valuable insights and help navigate complex legal and regulatory issues.

  2. Conduct Thorough Due Diligence

    • Legal Due Diligence: Conduct comprehensive legal due diligence to assess the startup’s compliance with applicable laws and regulations. This includes reviewing corporate documents, contracts, litigation history, and regulatory filings.

    • Regulatory Risk Assessment: Evaluate the regulatory risks associated with the startup’s business model and operations. This helps identify potential compliance challenges and develop mitigation strategies.

  3. Develop Clear Policies and Procedures

    • Compliance Policies: Develop and implement clear compliance policies and procedures for the CVC unit. This includes guidelines for due diligence, investment approvals, and ongoing monitoring of portfolio companies.

    • Training and Education: Provide regular training and education to the CVC team and portfolio companies on legal and regulatory compliance. This ensures that everyone understands their responsibilities and stays updated on regulatory changes.

  4. Monitor Regulatory Changes

    • Regulatory Watch: Establish a regulatory watch function to monitor changes in laws and regulations that may impact the CVC unit and its portfolio companies. This helps in proactively addressing compliance issues.

    • Industry Associations: Participate in industry associations and advocacy groups to stay informed about regulatory developments and engage in policy discussions. This can also provide a platform for influencing regulatory changes.

  5. Implement Robust Contract Management

    • Standardized Contracts: Use standardized contracts and templates to ensure consistency and compliance across all CVC transactions. This simplifies the contracting process and reduces legal risks.

    • Contract Management System: Implement a contract management system to track and manage all contractual agreements. This helps in maintaining oversight and ensuring compliance with contractual obligations.

Conclusion

Navigating the legal and regulatory landscape in Corporate Venture Capital is essential for ensuring compliance, mitigating risks, and achieving strategic success. By focusing on key legal and regulatory considerations and implementing best practices, CVC units can effectively manage these aspects and enhance their investment activities.

Engaging legal experts, conducting thorough due diligence, developing clear policies, monitoring regulatory changes, and implementing robust contract management are critical steps in this process. By following these best practices, corporations can build a strong foundation for their CVC programs, driving innovation and growth while ensuring legal and regulatory compliance.

Best Practices for Sourcing and Evaluating Startups in Corporate Venture Capital

In the competitive landscape of Corporate Venture Capital (CVC), sourcing and evaluating startups effectively is crucial for success. Identifying the right startups to invest in can drive innovation, strategic growth, and financial returns for the parent company. This article outlines best practices for sourcing high-potential startups and conducting thorough evaluations to ensure strategic alignment and investment success.

Best Practices for Sourcing Startups

  1. Building a Robust Network

    • Industry Events and Conferences: Attend industry-specific events, conferences, and trade shows to network with innovative startups and stay updated on the latest trends.

    • Academic and Research Partnerships: Collaborate with universities, research institutions, and innovation hubs to identify early-stage startups working on cutting-edge technologies.

    • VC and Accelerator Partnerships: Establish partnerships with traditional venture capital firms, accelerators, and incubators. These entities often have access to a pipeline of high-potential startups.

  2. Leveraging Internal Resources

    • Internal Innovation Programs: Encourage internal innovation programs and idea contests within the parent company. Employees can often identify promising startups through their industry connections and market insights.

    • Cross-functional Teams: Involve cross-functional teams from various departments (e.g., R&D, marketing, finance) in the startup sourcing process. Their diverse perspectives can help identify startups with the highest strategic fit.

  3. Utilizing Technology and Platforms

    • Startup Databases and Platforms: Use online startup databases and platforms such as Crunchbase, AngelList, and PitchBook to identify and track emerging startups.

    • Social Media and Online Communities: Monitor social media platforms and online communities where startups often showcase their innovations and seek partnerships.

  4. Developing a Strategic Focus

    • Clear Investment Criteria: Define clear investment criteria that align with the parent company’s strategic goals. This includes target industries, technology areas, and stages of development.

    • Thematic Sourcing: Focus on specific themes or problem areas that are strategically important to the parent company. This helps in identifying startups that can address key business challenges and opportunities.

Best Practices for Evaluating Startups

  1. Comprehensive Due Diligence

    • Market Analysis: Assess the startup’s target market, including market size, growth potential, and competitive landscape. This helps determine the startup’s potential for scalability and market penetration.

    • Technology Assessment: Evaluate the startup’s technology, including its uniqueness, scalability, and potential for integration with the parent company’s existing technologies.

    • Financial Health: Conduct a thorough financial analysis, including revenue streams, profitability, cash flow, and funding history. This ensures the startup has a solid financial foundation.

  2. Team and Leadership Evaluation

    • Founders’ Expertise and Track Record: Assess the founders’ backgrounds, expertise, and previous entrepreneurial experience. Strong leadership is often a key indicator of a startup’s potential for success.

    • Team Dynamics and Culture: Evaluate the startup’s team dynamics, culture, and organizational structure. A cohesive and motivated team is crucial for executing the startup’s vision and strategy.

  3. Strategic Fit and Synergy

    • Alignment with Corporate Strategy: Ensure the startup’s vision and goals align with the parent company’s strategic objectives. This includes assessing potential synergies and the startup’s ability to complement the company’s existing operations.

    • Integration Potential: Consider the ease of integrating the startup’s technology or products with the parent company’s systems and processes. Successful integration can drive greater value from the investment.

  4. Risk Assessment

    • Regulatory and Legal Risks: Identify any regulatory or legal risks associated with the startup’s business model or market. This includes intellectual property rights, compliance issues, and potential legal liabilities.

    • Market and Competitive Risks: Assess the risks related to market competition, customer adoption, and technological obsolescence. Understanding these risks helps in making informed investment decisions.

  5. Pilot Projects and Proof of Concept

    • Pilot Collaborations: Conduct pilot projects or proof-of-concept collaborations to test the startup’s technology and its potential impact on the parent company’s operations. This provides practical insights into the startup’s capabilities and strategic fit.

    • Feedback and Iteration: Use feedback from pilot projects to refine the evaluation process and identify areas for improvement. This iterative approach helps in making more accurate investment decisions.

Conclusion

Sourcing and evaluating startups effectively is a critical component of a successful Corporate Venture Capital program. By building a robust network, leveraging internal resources, utilizing technology, and developing a strategic focus, CVC units can identify high-potential startups that align with their corporate objectives.

Comprehensive due diligence, team evaluation, strategic fit assessment, risk assessment, and pilot projects are essential best practices for evaluating startups. By following these practices, CVC units can make informed investment decisions, drive innovation, and achieve strategic growth.

Ultimately, the success of a CVC program depends on its ability to identify and invest in startups that offer both financial returns and strategic value. By implementing the best practices outlined in this article, corporations can enhance their CVC programs and unlock the full potential of their investments in the startup ecosystem.

Measuring the Success of Corporate Venture Capital: Key Metrics and Best Practices

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) is not just about financial investments; it’s also about achieving strategic goals that align with the parent company's vision. To ensure a CVC program is delivering value, it’s essential to measure its success accurately. This article explores key metrics for evaluating CVC performance and best practices for implementing these measurements.

Key Metrics for Measuring CVC Success

  1. Financial Metrics

    • Return on Investment (ROI): ROI measures the profitability of investments. It’s a straightforward metric that calculates the gain or loss generated relative to the investment cost.

    • Internal Rate of Return (IRR): IRR is a more sophisticated financial metric that considers the time value of money. It’s used to evaluate the profitability of potential investments and compare the desirability of various investments.

    • Exit Multiples: This metric compares the exit value of an investment to its original investment amount. It provides a clear picture of the financial return achieved upon exiting an investment.

  2. Strategic Metrics

    • Innovation Adoption Rate: This metric tracks how successfully the innovations from CVC-backed startups are integrated into the parent company’s operations. It includes metrics like the number of new products or technologies adopted.

    • Market Penetration: Measures how the CVC investments help the parent company enter new markets or expand within existing ones. It includes market share growth and geographic expansion.

    • Technology Transfer Success: Assesses how effectively new technologies from the startups are transferred to and utilized by the parent company. It includes the number of technology integrations and their impact on the company’s operations.

  3. Operational Metrics

    • Deal Flow Quality: Measures the quality and quantity of investment opportunities sourced by the CVC unit. It includes the number of deals reviewed, the percentage of deals that meet investment criteria, and the number of deals closed.

    • Time to Deal: Tracks the efficiency of the investment process by measuring the time taken from identifying an opportunity to closing a deal. Faster deal cycles can indicate a more agile and effective CVC unit.

    • Portfolio Company Performance: Evaluates the performance of the startups in the CVC portfolio. This includes revenue growth, market position, and progress toward strategic milestones.

  4. Relationship Metrics

    • Startup Satisfaction: Measures the satisfaction levels of the startups with the support and value provided by the CVC unit. This can be assessed through surveys and feedback mechanisms.

    • Internal Stakeholder Engagement: Tracks the level of engagement and collaboration between the CVC unit and other departments within the parent company. Higher engagement levels often lead to better strategic alignment and innovation adoption.

Best Practices for Implementing CVC Metrics

  1. Balanced Scorecard Approach

    • Utilize a balanced scorecard approach to integrate financial, strategic, operational, and relationship metrics. This holistic view ensures that all aspects of the CVC program are measured and aligned with corporate objectives.

  2. Regular Performance Reviews

    • Conduct regular performance reviews to assess the progress of the CVC unit. These reviews should involve key stakeholders and include both quantitative and qualitative assessments.

  3. Dynamic Metrics Adjustment

    • Be prepared to adjust metrics as the CVC program evolves. The business environment and strategic goals can change, requiring new metrics or the adjustment of existing ones.

  4. Clear Communication

    • Communicate the importance and relevance of CVC metrics to all stakeholders. Ensure that everyone understands how these metrics align with the broader corporate strategy and objectives.

  5. Data-Driven Decisions

    • Base decisions on data and insights derived from the metrics. This helps in making informed and objective decisions regarding investments, strategic shifts, and operational improvements.

  6. Stakeholder Involvement

    • Involve key stakeholders in the development and review of CVC metrics. This ensures buy-in and helps align the CVC activities with the expectations and needs of the parent company.

  7. Continuous Learning

    • Foster a culture of continuous learning within the CVC unit. Use the insights gained from the metrics to improve processes, refine strategies, and enhance overall performance.

Conclusion

Measuring the success of a Corporate Venture Capital program is essential for ensuring it delivers both financial returns and strategic value. By implementing a balanced set of metrics and following best practices, companies can gain a comprehensive understanding of their CVC performance. This, in turn, enables them to make informed decisions, optimize their investment strategies, and achieve their long-term strategic objectives.

Key Components for Strategic Success in Corporate Venture Capital

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) has become a strategic imperative for companies aiming to stay ahead of the curve in innovation and market competition. However, the success of a CVC program hinges on several critical components. This article details these components and offers insights into how companies can leverage them to achieve strategic success.

1. Organizational Structure

A well-defined organizational structure is crucial for the effective operation of a CVC unit. This includes the placement of the CVC unit within the corporate hierarchy, the degree of autonomy it has, and the roles and responsibilities of its members.

  • Autonomy and Integration: The CVC unit should have enough autonomy to make swift investment decisions while remaining integrated with the parent company’s strategic goals. This balance ensures that the CVC activities align with corporate objectives without bureaucratic delays.

  • Dedicated Leadership: Appoint experienced leaders with a background in venture capital and strategic innovation to head the CVC unit. Their expertise and vision are essential for driving the unit’s success.

  • Cross-functional Teams: Incorporate diverse teams from various departments, including R&D, marketing, and finance, to provide comprehensive support to the CVC unit. This cross-functional approach enhances strategic alignment and resource utilization.

2. Governance

Effective governance structures are vital to oversee the CVC activities, ensuring alignment with corporate strategy and mitigating risks.

  • Strategic Committees: Establish strategic committees comprising senior executives and industry experts to guide the CVC unit’s decisions. These committees can provide valuable insights and ensure investments are strategically aligned.

  • Performance Reviews: Regular performance reviews and strategic audits help keep the CVC unit on track. These reviews should assess both financial returns and strategic contributions to the parent company.

  • Clear Investment Criteria: Define clear investment criteria that align with the company’s strategic objectives. This includes specifying target industries, stages of investment, and strategic goals such as technology acquisition or market expansion.

3. Investment Process

A robust investment process is essential for identifying and capitalizing on the right opportunities. This process should be well-structured and agile to respond to market dynamics.

  • Deal Sourcing: Develop a systematic approach to sourcing deals. This can include building networks with other VCs, attending industry events, and leveraging internal innovation programs.

  • Due Diligence: Conduct thorough due diligence to assess the financial health, market potential, and strategic fit of potential investments. This step is critical to mitigate risks and ensure the investment aligns with strategic goals.

  • Decision-making Framework: Implement a clear decision-making framework that allows for quick and informed investment decisions. This includes predefined evaluation criteria and approval processes.

4. Performance Metrics

Measuring the success of a CVC unit requires a balanced approach that includes both financial and strategic metrics.

  • Financial Metrics: Track traditional financial metrics such as return on investment (ROI), internal rate of return (IRR), and exit multiples. These metrics provide insights into the financial health of the CVC portfolio.

  • Strategic Metrics: Develop strategic metrics to assess the impact of CVC investments on the parent company’s strategic goals. This can include metrics like innovation adoption rates, market penetration, and technology transfer success.

  • Balanced Scorecard: Use a balanced scorecard approach to integrate financial and strategic metrics. This holistic view ensures a comprehensive assessment of the CVC unit’s performance.

5. Sustainability

Integrating sustainability into the CVC strategy ensures long-term success and alignment with broader corporate values.

  • Long-term Vision: Develop a long-term vision for the CVC unit that aligns with the company’s sustainability goals. This vision should guide investment decisions and strategic priorities.

  • Sustainable Investments: Prioritize investments in startups that focus on sustainable solutions and technologies. This aligns with global trends and enhances the company’s reputation as a responsible corporate citizen.

  • ESG Criteria: Incorporate environmental, social, and governance (ESG) criteria into the investment evaluation process. This ensures that the CVC activities contribute positively to societal goals and mitigate risks associated with unsustainable practices.

Conclusion

Achieving strategic success in corporate venture capital requires a well-structured approach that integrates organizational structure, governance, investment process, performance metrics, and sustainability. By focusing on these key components, corporations can enhance their CVC programs, driving innovation, strategic growth, and long-term success.

The strategic value of CVC goes beyond financial returns, offering corporations the opportunity to stay competitive, access new technologies, and enter emerging markets. By leveraging the insights and best practices outlined in this article, companies can navigate the complexities of CVC and unlock its full potential.

Building Effective Relationships Between Startups and Corporate Venture Capitalists

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) can be a game-changer for startups, providing not just funding but also valuable resources, expertise, and market access. However, for these relationships to be truly beneficial, both startups and corporate venture capitalists need to establish strong, collaborative partnerships. This article explores how startups can benefit from CVCs, the importance of long-term commitment, and strategies for maintaining a successful collaboration.

Benefits of CVC for Startups

  1. Access to Resources

    • Startups partnering with CVCs gain access to the extensive resources of large corporations. This includes R&D facilities, manufacturing capabilities, marketing channels, and distribution networks, which can significantly accelerate growth.

  2. Market Insights and Expertise

    • Corporations often have deep industry knowledge and market insights that can be invaluable for startups. CVCs provide strategic guidance and mentorship, helping startups navigate market challenges and refine their business models.

  3. Brand Credibility

    • Association with a well-established corporation can enhance a startup's credibility and brand recognition. This can open doors to new customers, partners, and investors who might otherwise be hesitant to engage with a fledgling company.

  4. Growth Opportunities

    • CVCs can facilitate access to new markets and customer segments. Through their established networks and market presence, corporations can help startups scale more quickly and efficiently.

The Importance of Long-term Commitment

For CVC relationships to be successful, both parties need to commit to a long-term partnership. Here’s why long-term commitment is crucial:

  1. Trust Building

    • Trust is the foundation of any successful partnership. Long-term commitment fosters trust, allowing both parties to work more collaboratively and transparently.

  2. Strategic Alignment

    • Long-term relationships enable better strategic alignment. Startups can better understand and align with the corporation's goals, ensuring that their innovations and business strategies complement the parent company’s objectives.

  3. Sustainable Growth

    • Long-term partnerships promote sustainable growth. Startups can take a more measured approach to scaling, leveraging corporate resources to build a solid foundation rather than seeking quick exits.

Strategies for Maintaining a Collaborative Relationship

  1. Clear Communication

    • Establish clear and open lines of communication from the outset. Regular updates, meetings, and feedback sessions ensure that both parties are aligned and can address any issues promptly.

  2. Mutual Goals and Expectations

    • Define mutual goals and expectations early in the partnership. This includes not only financial objectives but also strategic and operational targets. Having a shared vision helps in driving the collaboration forward.

  3. Flexible Partnership Structures

    • Create flexible partnership structures that allow for adjustments as the relationship evolves. This might include revisiting terms, equity stakes, and strategic priorities to reflect changing market conditions and business needs.

  4. Cultural Fit

    • Ensure a good cultural fit between the startup and the corporate partner. Cultural compatibility enhances collaboration, fosters innovation, and minimizes friction. Conducting cultural assessments and integration workshops can be beneficial.

  5. Supportive Networks

    • Leverage the corporation’s networks to provide additional support to the startup. This includes connecting the startup with industry experts, potential customers, and other relevant stakeholders within the corporate ecosystem.

  6. Performance Metrics

    • Develop comprehensive performance metrics to track the success of the partnership. These should include both quantitative and qualitative measures, such as financial performance, innovation milestones, and strategic alignment.

  7. Conflict Resolution Mechanisms

    • Implement clear conflict resolution mechanisms. Disagreements are inevitable, but having predefined processes for addressing conflicts ensures that they do not derail the partnership.

  8. Continuous Engagement

    • Maintain continuous engagement through joint projects, innovation workshops, and collaborative initiatives. This keeps the relationship dynamic and aligned with evolving business objectives.

Conclusion

Building effective relationships between startups and corporate venture capitalists requires a combination of clear communication, mutual goals, cultural fit, and long-term commitment. By fostering collaborative partnerships, both startups and corporations can unlock significant strategic value. Startups gain access to resources, expertise, and market opportunities, while corporations benefit from innovative solutions and strategic insights.

In an ever-evolving business landscape, the success of CVC relationships hinges on the ability to adapt, communicate, and maintain a shared vision. By implementing the strategies outlined in this article, startups and corporate venture capitalists can build strong, enduring partnerships that drive innovation and sustainable growth.

Navigating the Challenges of Corporate Venture Capital

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) is a powerful tool for fostering innovation and strategic growth within large corporations. However, the journey of managing a successful CVC program is fraught with challenges. From maintaining strategic focus to overcoming internal resistance, corporations must navigate a complex landscape to realize the full potential of their CVC investments. This article delves into the common challenges faced by CVCs and offers strategies to address them effectively.

Common Challenges in Corporate Venture Capital

  1. Maintaining Strategic Focus

    • One of the primary challenges in CVC is ensuring that investments align with the corporation's strategic objectives. Without a clear focus, CVC programs risk becoming scattered and failing to deliver meaningful value to the parent company.

  2. Overcoming Internal Resistance

    • Introducing a CVC program often meets with resistance from within the organization. Existing business units may view CVC as a threat or distraction, leading to friction and lack of cooperation.

  3. Balancing Autonomy and Integration

    • CVC units need a certain degree of autonomy to operate effectively and make agile investment decisions. However, they must also integrate their activities with the parent company's strategic goals, creating a delicate balance.

  4. Ensuring Effective Governance

    • Governance structures must balance oversight with flexibility. Too much control can stifle innovation, while too little can lead to misalignment with corporate strategy.

  5. Measuring Strategic Impact

    • Unlike traditional venture capital, where financial returns are the primary metric, CVC must also measure strategic impact. This is often more difficult to quantify and requires robust frameworks and metrics.

  6. Attracting and Retaining Talent

    • Building a skilled CVC team is crucial for success. Attracting talent with both venture capital expertise and strategic insight, and retaining them in a corporate environment, can be challenging.

Strategies to Overcome CVC Challenges

  1. Define Clear Strategic Objectives

    • Establish clear and specific strategic objectives for the CVC program. These should align with the broader goals of the parent company and provide a framework for evaluating potential investments.

  2. Foster Internal Collaboration

    • Promote a culture of collaboration between the CVC unit and other business units. This can be achieved through regular communication, joint projects, and incentivizing cooperation.

  3. Establish Autonomy with Accountability

    • Grant the CVC unit sufficient autonomy to make quick and independent decisions. Simultaneously, implement accountability mechanisms to ensure alignment with corporate strategy, such as regular reporting and strategic reviews.

  4. Implement Robust Governance Structures

    • Develop governance structures that provide oversight without micromanaging. This includes setting clear investment guidelines, performance metrics, and decision-making processes.

  5. Develop Comprehensive Performance Metrics

    • Create a balanced set of performance metrics that include both financial returns and strategic impact. Use tools like the balanced scorecard to track progress and adjust strategies as needed.

  6. Build a Skilled and Diverse Team

    • Recruit individuals with diverse backgrounds, including venture capital, industry expertise, and strategic planning. Offer competitive compensation and career development opportunities to retain top talent.

  7. Leverage External Partnerships

    • Form strategic partnerships with other venture capital firms, industry experts, and academic institutions. These partnerships can provide additional insights, co-investment opportunities, and access to innovative ideas.

  8. Continuous Learning and Adaptation

    • Foster a culture of continuous learning within the CVC unit. Encourage team members to stay updated on industry trends, emerging technologies, and best practices. Regularly review and adapt the CVC strategy based on new insights and market changes.

Conclusion

Navigating the challenges of corporate venture capital requires a strategic and adaptable approach. By addressing common obstacles such as maintaining strategic focus, overcoming internal resistance, and balancing autonomy with integration, corporations can enhance the effectiveness of their CVC programs. Implementing robust governance structures, developing comprehensive performance metrics, and building a skilled team are crucial steps in this journey.

Ultimately, the success of a CVC program depends on its ability to align with the parent company's strategic objectives while remaining flexible and innovative. By understanding and addressing these challenges, corporations can harness the full potential of CVC to drive innovation, strategic growth, and long-term success in an ever-evolving business landscape.

The Strategic Value of Corporate Venture Capital: Beyond Financial Returns

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) has emerged as a vital strategy for large corporations looking to stay competitive and innovative. While traditional venture capital focuses primarily on financial returns, CVC seeks to create strategic value that aligns with the parent company’s long-term goals. This article explores the strategic benefits of CVC, the balance between financial and strategic objectives, and how companies can maximize the strategic value of their investments.

Strategic Benefits of Corporate Venture Capital

  1. Access to New Technologies

    • One of the primary strategic benefits of CVC is the ability to gain early access to emerging technologies. By investing in startups at the forefront of innovation, corporations can stay ahead of technological trends and integrate new solutions into their business models.

  2. Market Expansion

    • CVC allows companies to explore and enter new markets with less risk. By backing startups that operate in different regions or sectors, corporations can gain insights and footholds in areas where they have limited presence.

  3. Innovative Business Models

    • Startups often bring innovative business models that can disrupt traditional industries. Through CVC, corporations can learn from these new approaches and potentially adapt them to their own operations, fostering a culture of innovation within the parent company.

  4. Strengthened Competitive Position

    • Investing in innovative startups can provide a competitive edge by enhancing the company’s product offerings and operational efficiencies. This strategic positioning helps corporations differentiate themselves from competitors.

Balancing Financial and Strategic Objectives

While the strategic benefits of CVC are clear, it is essential to balance these with financial objectives to ensure the sustainability of the investments. Here are key considerations:

  1. Clear Strategic Alignment

    • Ensure that each investment aligns with the corporation’s broader strategic goals. This alignment helps maintain focus and ensures that the investments contribute to long-term objectives rather than short-term gains.

  2. Performance Metrics

    • Develop comprehensive metrics that evaluate both financial performance and strategic value. This includes traditional financial metrics such as ROI, as well as strategic indicators like market penetration, technological advancements, and competitive positioning.

  3. Long-term Commitment

    • Strategic value often takes longer to realize than financial returns. Corporations need to commit to long-term relationships with their portfolio companies to fully leverage the strategic benefits.

  4. Collaborative Relationships

    • Foster strong, collaborative relationships with startups. This involves more than just providing capital; it includes offering mentorship, resources, and access to corporate networks. Such support can enhance the startup’s chances of success, which in turn benefits the parent company strategically.

Maximizing Strategic Value from CVC

To maximize the strategic value of their CVC activities, corporations should consider the following best practices:

  1. Dedicated CVC Unit

    • Establish a dedicated CVC unit with its own leadership and resources. This unit should have the autonomy to make investment decisions while aligning with the parent company’s strategic objectives.

  2. Cross-functional Teams

    • Involve cross-functional teams from different departments in the CVC process. This ensures that diverse perspectives are considered and that the strategic benefits of the investments are maximized across the organization.

  3. Continuous Learning and Adaptation

    • The business environment is constantly evolving. CVC units should continuously learn from their investments and adapt their strategies accordingly. This iterative approach helps maintain strategic relevance and responsiveness.

  4. Strong Governance and Oversight

    • Implement robust governance structures to oversee CVC activities. This includes setting clear objectives, monitoring performance, and ensuring that the CVC unit operates in alignment with the parent company’s strategic goals.

  5. Strategic Partnerships

    • Leverage strategic partnerships with other corporations, venture capital firms, and industry experts. These partnerships can provide additional insights, resources, and opportunities for co-investment, enhancing the strategic value of the CVC activities.

Conclusion

Corporate Venture Capital offers a unique opportunity for corporations to achieve strategic objectives beyond mere financial returns. By investing in innovative startups, companies can access new technologies, expand into new markets, and strengthen their competitive position. Balancing financial and strategic objectives, fostering collaborative relationships, and implementing best practices can maximize the strategic value of CVC investments.

As the business landscape continues to evolve, the role of CVC in driving strategic value will become increasingly important. By understanding and leveraging the strategic benefits of CVC, corporations can ensure their long-term success and sustainability in a rapidly changing world.

Understanding Corporate Venture Capital: A Comprehensive Guide

In today's fast-paced and innovation-driven market, companies are constantly seeking ways to stay ahead of the competition. One powerful tool that has emerged over the years is Corporate Venture Capital (CVC). Unlike traditional venture capital, CVC combines financial investment with strategic goals, making it a unique and valuable approach for both corporations and startups. In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore what corporate venture capital is, how it differs from traditional venture capital, and why it is significant in the current business landscape.

What is Corporate Venture Capital?

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) is a form of venture capital where a corporate entity invests in startup companies. These investments are not merely for financial returns but are strategically aligned to benefit the parent company's business objectives. The primary goals of CVC include:

  • Access to Innovation: By investing in startups, corporations gain access to cutting-edge technologies and innovative business models.

  • Market Expansion: CVC allows companies to enter new markets and explore emerging trends that might be outside their core operations.

  • Competitive Edge: These investments help corporations stay competitive by integrating new ideas and solutions into their existing business structure.

How Does CVC Differ from Traditional Venture Capital?

While both CVC and traditional venture capital (VC) involve investing in startups, their objectives and approaches differ significantly:

  • Primary Goal: Traditional VC focuses on financial returns. Investors look for high-growth potential startups to maximize their return on investment. In contrast, CVC seeks strategic value alongside financial returns. The investments aim to enhance the parent company's strategic position.

  • Investment Horizon: Traditional VCs often have a shorter investment horizon, typically looking for exits through IPOs or acquisitions within a few years. CVCs, however, might have a longer-term perspective, aligned with the strategic goals of the parent company.

  • Support and Involvement: While traditional VCs provide financial support and some mentorship, CVCs often offer more extensive resources, including access to corporate expertise, infrastructure, and networks.

The Significance of CVC in Today's Market

The role of corporate venture capital has become increasingly significant in today's business environment for several reasons:

  • Rapid Technological Advancements: With the fast pace of technological change, corporations need to innovate continuously. CVC provides a mechanism to tap into the latest advancements without having to develop everything in-house.

  • Strategic Flexibility: CVCs offer companies the flexibility to explore new business models and technologies without committing to large-scale changes immediately. This allows for experimentation and agile adaptation to market shifts.

  • Enhanced Collaboration: Through CVC, corporations and startups can form symbiotic relationships. Startups benefit from the resources and market access provided by large corporations, while corporations gain fresh perspectives and innovative solutions.

Key Components for Successful CVC

To harness the full potential of corporate venture capital, companies need to consider several critical components:

  1. Organizational Structure: Establish a dedicated CVC unit with clear goals and sufficient autonomy to make investment decisions.

  2. Governance: Implement governance structures that balance strategic alignment with operational independence. Ensure that CVC managers have the right mix of internal and external expertise.

  3. Investment Strategy: Define the investment focus clearly, whether it is driving, enabling, or emergent investments. Align these with the parent company's strategic objectives.

  4. Performance Metrics: Develop comprehensive metrics to measure both financial and strategic value. This includes traditional ROI as well as strategic indicators like market penetration and technology integration.

  5. Sustainability: Integrate sustainability into the CVC strategy. Ensure that investments align with long-term corporate goals, including environmental and social governance (ESG) criteria.

Conclusion

Corporate Venture Capital is a powerful tool for companies looking to innovate and maintain a competitive edge in today's dynamic market. By strategically investing in startups, corporations can access new technologies, explore emerging markets, and foster innovation. Understanding the unique aspects of CVC and implementing best practices can lead to significant strategic advantages and sustainable growth.

By leveraging the strengths of both corporations and startups, CVC creates a win-win scenario that drives business success and innovation. As the business landscape continues to evolve, the role of CVC will undoubtedly become even more critical in shaping the future of industries worldwide.

Major Innovations Shaping Today's Tech Industry and France's Reindustrialization: A Comprehensive Analysis

Introduction

The technological landscape is undergoing a period of remarkable transformation, driven by groundbreaking advancements like Artificial Intelligence (AI), blockchain, and the Internet of Things (IoT). These innovations are disrupting various sectors, fostering economic growth, and creating unprecedented possibilities. This article explores the impact of these key technologies and analyzes France's reindustrialization strategy that leverages these advancements.

Key Technological Innovations

  • Artificial Intelligence (AI): AI, powered by machine learning, natural language processing, and data analytics, is revolutionizing industries. From automation and personalized customer experiences to predictive maintenance, AI is optimizing operations and empowering better decision-making. Its integration across healthcare, finance, and manufacturing is driving significant economic growth and innovation.

  • Blockchain Technology: Blockchain offers a secure, transparent, and tamper-proof platform for transactions. It is transforming sectors like finance, supply chain management, and real estate by enabling secure and decentralized operations. Smart contracts, built on blockchain, automate and streamline processes, reducing costs and enhancing reliability. This fosters trust and transparency in digital transactions, promoting widespread adoption.

  • Internet of Things (IoT): IoT connects devices, enabling real-time data collection and analysis. This data empowers industries like healthcare, agriculture, and smart cities to optimize operations, resource utilization, and decision-making. IoT's potential to revolutionize everyday life and industrial processes is immense, with applications for monitoring, automation, and predictive analytics.

France's Reindustrialization Strategy

France is actively pursuing a robust reindustrialization strategy to revitalize its manufacturing sector. This ambitious plan aims to increase the industrial value-added contribution to GDP to 12% by 2035, creating up to 800,000 new jobs. However, challenges in financing, innovation, skills development, and sustainability need to be addressed.

  • Economic Sovereignty: Reindustrialization is crucial for enhancing France's economic sovereignty. By reducing reliance on foreign manufacturing, France aims to strengthen its domestic production capabilities. This approach ensures greater resilience against global supply chain disruptions and strengthens the national economy.

  • Innovation and Technology Adoption: France recognizes the importance of adopting advanced technologies for successful reindustrialization. Integrating AI, IoT, and automation into manufacturing processes is key to achieving greater productivity and global competitiveness. The focus on research & development (R&D) and collaboration between academia and industry fosters innovation, driving economic growth.

  • Skills Development: Developing a skilled workforce is paramount for France's reindustrialization success. Investments in education and training programs aim to equip individuals with the necessary skills for modern manufacturing. Collaboration between industries and educational institutions ensures a steady supply of qualified professionals, addressing the existing skills gap.

  • Sustainability and Green Initiatives: Sustainability is a core principle of France's reindustrialization strategy. The emphasis is on green technologies and eco-friendly practices to reduce carbon emissions and promote environmental sustainability. Investments in renewable energy sources and sustainable manufacturing processes align with global environmental goals.

Conclusion

The convergence of major technological advancements and France's strategic reindustrialization efforts presents a unique opportunity for significant economic growth and development. Embracing AI, blockchain, and IoT can drive industrial transformation, while France's reindustrialization efforts can enhance economic sovereignty and sustainability. By fostering innovation, developing a skilled workforce, and prioritizing sustainability, France is well-positioned to become a leader in the global industrial landscape.

L'importance des PME-ETI dans l'économie française : un atout sous-estimé

Introduction

Les Petites et Moyennes Entreprises (PME) et les Entreprises de Taille Intermédiaire (ETI) jouent un rôle crucial dans l'économie française. Contribuant significativement à la croissance, à l'emploi et à l'ancrage local, ces entreprises sont pourtant souvent méconnues. Cet article explore leur importance et propose des stratégies pour mieux les valoriser et les soutenir.

La contribution des PME-ETI à l'économie française

Les PME-ETI sont décisives pour l’économie française. Elles représentent une part importante du tissu économique et jouent un rôle clé dans la création de valeur ajoutée et d’emplois. Voici quelques points clés de leur contribution :

  • Croissance économique : Les PME-ETI contribuent de manière significative à la croissance du PIB français. Elles apportent une diversité économique essentielle et permettent de dynamiser le marché intérieur.

  • Création d’emplois : Elles sont responsables d'une part importante des créations d’emplois, particulièrement dans les territoires. En 2023, les PME-ETI ont contribué à la création de plus de 50 000 emplois par an, un chiffre qui pourrait augmenter dans les années à venir.

  • Ancrage local : Elles favorisent le développement économique local et régional en s'intégrant dans le tissu économique local. Les PME-ETI sont souvent bien enracinées dans leur région, ce qui leur permet de mieux comprendre et répondre aux besoins locaux.

Ambitions de croissance des industriels

Les défis spécifiques des PME-ETI

Malgré leur importance, les PME-ETI font face à des défis spécifiques qui freinent leur développement :

  • Accès au financement : Les PME-ETI ont souvent des difficultés à accéder aux financements nécessaires pour leur croissance. Les banques et les investisseurs préfèrent souvent les grandes entreprises perçues comme moins risquées.

  • Innovation et compétitivité : La capacité à innover et à rester compétitives sur le marché global est un autre défi majeur. Les PME-ETI doivent constamment innover pour maintenir leur position sur le marché.

  • Ressources humaines : Attirer et retenir les talents est crucial pour leur succès, mais souvent difficile à réaliser. Les PME-ETI doivent offrir des conditions de travail attractives pour rivaliser avec les grandes entreprises.

Stratégies pour valoriser et soutenir les PME-ETI

Pour maximiser le potentiel des PME-ETI, plusieurs stratégies peuvent être mises en place :

  • Accroître l'accès au financement : Développer des mécanismes de financement adaptés aux besoins des PME-ETI. Cela pourrait inclure des fonds d'investissement spécifiques pour les PME-ETI ou des garanties de prêts.

  • Encourager l'innovation : Mettre en place des programmes de soutien à l'innovation et à la R&D. Les PME-ETI pourraient bénéficier de subventions pour la recherche et le développement, ainsi que de partenariats avec des institutions académiques.

  • Renforcer les compétences : Investir dans la formation et le développement des compétences des employés. Les programmes de formation continue et les apprentissages peuvent aider à répondre aux besoins en compétences des PME-ETI.

  • Favoriser les réseaux et les partenariats : Encourager les partenariats entre PME-ETI et grands groupes pour favoriser les synergies et les échanges de bonnes pratiques. Les clusters et les réseaux d'affaires peuvent jouer un rôle clé à cet égard.

Cas pratiques de soutien aux PME-ETI

  1. Programme d'incubation et d'accélération : De nombreux territoires ont mis en place des programmes d'incubation et d'accélération pour aider les PME-ETI à se développer. Ces programmes offrent un soutien en termes de financement, de mentorat et d'accès au marché.

  2. Subventions pour l'innovation : Des subventions spécifiques pour l'innovation permettent aux PME-ETI de mener des projets de recherche et développement, augmentant ainsi leur compétitivité sur le marché.

  3. Partenariats avec des grandes entreprises : Les partenariats stratégiques avec de grandes entreprises peuvent aider les PME-ETI à accéder à de nouveaux marchés et à bénéficier de ressources supplémentaires.

Conclusion

Les PME-ETI sont des acteurs clés de l’économie française, mais elles nécessitent un soutien accru pour surmonter leurs défis et réaliser leur plein potentiel. En mettant en place des stratégies adaptées, il est possible de renforcer leur rôle et de favoriser une croissance économique durable et inclusive.

Messages clés

  • Les PME-ETI sont cruciales pour la croissance économique et la création d'emplois en France.

  • Elles font face à des défis spécifiques, notamment en termes de financement, d'innovation et de ressources humaines.

  • Des stratégies adaptées, telles que l'amélioration de l'accès au financement, le soutien à l'innovation, et le renforcement des compétences, sont essentielles pour leur succès.

A view on the Web3 ecosystem

Mandalore Partners shares its view on Web3 and blockchain dynamics in 2022, focusing on mapping decentralized applications. The geographical scope is mainly Europe, North America and Asia.

Economy of Web3

Mandalore holds that the industry of Web3 will transform all economic sectors on a global scale. As a component of Web3, blockchains have the potential to have a greater impact on how we interact with the internet on how many software applications are currently operating their backends. The way we produce and transmit value online is particularly relevant from an economic standpoint. With the chance to have more power and individuality than ever before, creators are in charge right now.

As it can be seen on the following graph, web3 was a subject of growing interest during the 2 last years.

Search Volume Web3 - Mandalore Partners

2023 is likely to see other countries moving to position themselves as Web3-friendly – often through the use of central bank digital currencies – such as India's forthcoming e-rupee and China's Digital Yuan. This dynamics is all the more important as it accompanies the development of artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and metaverse – all technologies which are closely related to new developments in Web3. This represents a very opportunity market for a venture capital firm. However for now, the relative cost of transactions is still prohibitive to many. Web3 is less likely to be utilized in less-wealthy, developing nations due to high transaction fees.

What is Web3 ? A decentralized web

Web3 is a decentralized, trustful, and private internet that makes use of blockchain technology. Web3 refers to the next generation of internet technology, which is based on a decentralized infrastructure. This means that no central authority controls or regulates the internet, and users have more control over their data and privacy: we talk about decentralized web. It has several key characteristics that differentiate it from the current internet:

Decentralized

The biggest difference between web3 and the current internet is that web3 is decentralized, whereas the current internet is centralized with still some static websites. This means that there is no central authority controlling or regulating web3, and users have more control over their data and privacy. It remplaces the ancient web by the ability to create open protocols and decentralized, community-run networks, combining the open infrastructure of web1 with the public participation of web2. One of the goals of the Web3 movement is to create a decentralized social networks.

Secure

One of the advantages of decentralization is that it makes the web3 more secure. Since there is no central server or database, it is much harder for hackers to access user data. Also, each user's data is stored on their own computer, so even if a hacker were to gain access to a database, they could only access the data of one person at a time.

Private

Another advantage of decentralization is that it makes the web3 more private. Since there is no central server or database, companies cannot track users' online activity. In addition, each user's data is stored on their own computer, so companies cannot access it without the user's permission.

Permissionless

Everyone has equal access to participate in Web3, and no one gets excluded.

Web3 and Blockchain

The Web3 is built on the blockchain which gives the precedent advantages. This technology is not only used for cryptocurrencies, it is also used to conclude contracts or to control the functioning of applications thanks to smart contracts.

As a reminder, it is a kind of registry that contains a list of all exchanges made between users. This register is decentralized - i.e. stored on the servers of its users - and very secure because it relies on a cryptographic system of validation by the users for each transaction. Hence the name "blockchain". It uses smart contracts that are algorithms that operates on the blockchain. You can find a definition of smart contracts on Binance Academy website: https://academy.binance.com/en/glossary/smart-contract.

In the case of decentralized web, this allows the creation of financial assets, in the form of tokens for example, to ensure the internal functioning of each service. The platforms is therefore operated, owned and improved by communities of users. The idea behind Web3 is that technologies like blockchain , cryptocurrencies, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), and decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) give us the tools we need to create online spaces that we truly own, and even to implement digital democracies.

Each user has his digital identity, creating a record on the blockchain of all their activities. And, for example, each time they post a message, they can earn a token for their contribution, giving them both a way to participate within the platform and a financial asset.

A Web3 Map

Venture Map of Web3 - Mandalore Partners

Venture Map of Web3

Here is a commentary about the different categories presented.

I. Infrastructure

Developer tools: Developer tools are pieces of decentralized blockchains software like protocols, Layer X solutions, APIs, and SDKs that make it easier for blockchains to communicate with one another and perform more robustly.

Data analytics: Startups in this category provides blockchain data and analytics solutions to their customers.

Security & Privacy: Startups in this category are developing security and privacy solutions on top of existing blockchains

Reg Tech: Companies that provides various regulatory and compliance solutions to the blockchain ecosystem in areas such as tax compliance and anti-money laundering

Entreprise: Startups working on blockchain-based solutions for healthcare institutions across several fields, including life sciences and clinical trials. Some companies offer blockchain-based supply chain solutions to address issues like agricultural traceability and help them with better vision. Some companies provide a range of blockchain technologies geared toward business use cases.

II. Fintech - Decentralized finance

Currencies: Currencies that run on different blockchains. Created largely with the intention of developing better currency for various use cases, these projects represent either a store of value, a medium of exchange, or a unit of account.

Payment: Startups that provide payment services and support cryptocurrency transactions by developing and running cryptocurrency exchanges or by creating cryptocurrency trading applications.

Insurance: Types of Company that provide insurance technology solutions on the promise of innovation. These projects protect against the vulnerabilities of smart contracts or price volatility by raising public funds to use as hedges.

Wallet services: Startups in this category are developing and operating
crypto wallets. It develops of digital asset security infrastructure helping crypto-native and financial institutions to create digital wallets.

III. NFTs

Most people have probably heard of NFTs, it is a transaction stored on the blockchain which corresponds to non fungible tokens, and therefore completely unique. The idea is to be able to use it as a certificate of authenticity associated with a digital or physical object. Each token is unique but obviously players can have ownership of tokens on different platforms. Among these projects, different types of tokens exist, such as governance tokens, equity tokens, security tokens, or utility tokens.

Gaming: NFT technology is being incorporated into video games by startups in this sector, opening up new business models like play-to-earn. The main contribution of the blockchain for users and players is the "play to earn": each player can play and indulge his passion by earning crypto-currencies. This model appeared with the birth of NFT, these certificates that allow to attest the authenticity of a digital object and therefore to own them, then to resell them. The decentralization brought by the blockchain (no central regulating entity) causes a potential paradigm shift: players no longer pay a license or subscription to play, but invest in the game to obtain tokens and develop, and then earn money from these benefits. Purchased NFTs bring decision-making power, which can take many forms and is independent of the publisher, and bring a gain.

Marketplace: Types of company that are developing and operating exchanges meant to help mint and trade NFTs on different platforms, for very various way of use (art, music,...)

Community: Examples of social media platforms designed for team collaboration, program management and member tracking. Interact with fans on a whole new level through easy to access channels where they can post commentary, fan art,...

Metaverse: The metaverse (contraction of "meta" and "universe", i.e. meta-universe) is a network of always-on virtual environments in which many people can interact with each other and with these digital objects while operating virtual representations - or avatars - of themselves. Corporations in this category are developing NFT experiences
related to the evolving metaverse.

Please find below the different maps on the web3 market that helped us build ours:

Web3 market map from TechCrunch

Tech Crunch Web3 Map

TechCrunch Web3 Map

Web3 market map from Coinbase

Coinbase Web3 Map

Coinbase Web3 Map

Web3 market map from Crunchbase

Crunchbase Web3 Map

Crunchbase Web3 Map

Web3 market map from SPEEDINVEST

Speedinvest Web3 Map

Speedinvest Web3 Map

You can find more information on our commitment to Web3 activities on our website: https://www.mandalorepartners.com/web3surance

Feel free to contact us to discuss a partnership or for more information about this article.

Minh Q. Tran, minh@mandalorepartners.com

Insurance Trends in Asia: A Bright Future For Insurtechs? #VC

Insurance in Asia has extremely high growth potential…

Insurtech and insurance in general has extremely high growth prospects in the region, much more so than in other more mature markets like Europe. 

Over 40% of the middle class population in Southeast Asia is uninsured: the scope of penetration for digitally charged insurance businesses through technology mediums like smartphones is huge. As standards of living rise and health concerns (for example linked to the pandemic) remain a preponderant issue, we expect demand for insurance products to increase. Penetration rates for Asia-Pacific stood at 3.8% for life insurance and 2.1% for non-life insurance in 2018, considerably lower than in the UK and the US that reported rates of over 10%. Insurance company Swiss Re estimates that by 2029, 42% of gross insurance premiums would originate from Asia-Pacific, with China accounting for 20% of this. Asian consumers are increasingly looking at insurance not just as a protection but also as an investment option.

This is likely to lead to significant revenue growth for actors in this industry, as shown above by the projection of the evolution of premiums in the coming years. 

….providing a unique opportunity for the development of insurtechs…

According to McKinsey, insurance companies in Asia are therefore very aggressive in terms of growth prospects, and insurtech can be a key way to rapidly reach under-served consumers.

The key point is that while there is a very large potential for growth, it may not be best served by traditional insurers. As shown above, customers now prefer digital solutions.  This is where insurtechs can play a major role. 

Indeed, VC funding in the sector has reached large levels in recent years. Venture capital has also recognized the potential profits to be made from digitally disrupting insurance. According to a paper by Bain,  in the past five years, venture capital firms have invested about $3.8 billion in Asia-Pacific insurtechs, including online sites that sell directly to the public, online brokers and advisers, and aggregators or digital marketplaces.

According to the report, in fast-growing markets such as mainland China, India and Indonesia, insurtechs can “leapfrog” incumbents and gain market share. Digital marketplaces, which allow customers to easily compare and select policies from competing carriers, may be able to conquer a significant share of the insurance profit pool. In major markets around the world, a majority of retail insurance customers—especially young, digitally active ones—are open to switching to another provider, including companies from outside the industry, such as retailers, automakers or tech firms, according to Bain & Company’s fourth global survey of more than 174,000 customers in 18 countries (“Customer Behavior and Loyalty in Insurance: Global Edition 2018”). Asia-Pacific insurance consumers are very receptive to new ideas and new players. In Thailand, Indonesia, mainland China and Malaysia, for example, more than 85% are open to buying from new entrants, according to Bain’s survey.

…which for now remain concentrated in mainland China, Hong Kong and other East Asian countries. However a key trend for coming years will be the emergence of new markets

Banks in financial hubs of SouthAsia, Singapore, and Hong Kong have already received significant investments in Insurtech: For example, DBS bank from Manulife of 1.2 Billion dollars, Citibank from AIA group 800 Million dollars and Standard Charted from Prudential 1.25 Billion dollars.

Singapore and Hongkong are providing a wide range of development and growth options like incubators, insurance labs and more for startups in the insurtech sector.

Asian Insurtechs startups and CVC

Examples of insurtech startups from around the region

As shown above, a number of high potential ventures have developed around the region. For instance, China is also seeking to build up big online platforms to provide various insurance options personal, medical, auto online. Malaysia has already started reaping the benefits of such platforms by slowly reducing the need for live agents.

Nonetheless, other markets are also seeing the development of insurtechs. For example, insurtech funding in India has increased from only 11 million USD in 2016 to 287 million in 2020, with startups such as Turtlemint which raised 30 million in late 2020. 

Insurtech can help the sector remove obstacles to growth…

According to McKinsey, Asian insurers currently tend to suffer from three main weaknesses: 

Sales force professionalization. The entire US insurance industry, as one example, has a few hundred thousand agents. Agency forces in Asia are significantly larger—China alone has roughly eight million insurance agents. However, the level of professionalization in Asia lags behind the developed world. Part-time and poorly trained agents are the norm in much of Asia. As customers continue to grow more sophisticated, Asian carriers will have to upgrade their agency forces. They can learn much from the West in terms of recruiting, capability building, and ongoing performance- and compliance-management. Western carriers are now helping agents migrate from product sellers to holistic advisors which provides a blueprint for Asia.

Analytics-driven decision making. The West is increasingly applying data and analytics in all elements of the business to improve the quality and consistency of decision making. In some cases, this has progressed to rely extensively on third-party data. In Asia, the use of data and analytics is less mature. Carriers need to invest in their internal data assets (i.e., capturing and storing more useful data), external third-party data integration, advanced analytics capabilities, and “last mile” adoption of analytics solutions. There is tremendous opportunity for carriers in all elements of the value chain, including pricing and underwriting, sales force effectiveness, customer servicing, and claims. Given the distributed nature of insurance operations in Asia and the talent gap, this is an even bigger opportunity.

Operational discipline and efficiency. Asian carriers can learn from the operational discipline of insurers in developed markets. Faced with the prospect of slower growth, Western insurers have long focused on improving efficiency through more optimized operations. Asian executives have underinvested in operational discipline and efficiency. It is not uncommon to find dozens of branches or field offices with widely varying operating practices. This increases costs, delivers suboptimal customer experience, and introduces significant compliance risk. Asian carriers will have to focus more time and investment on these issues in the near future. They can benefit from the new toolbox that has emerged which combines digital, analytics, robotics, and NLP to re-invent customer and back office journeys.

… and artificial intelligence is a key driver of change

The advancement of Artificial Intelligence (A.I) allows for much faster understanding of this data. This empowers intermediaries and underwriters to engage clients knowledgeable with data driven policy advice in real time.

Customers want to connect with insurers from virtually anywhere and at any time. The employment of AI processing will soon permeate almost every facet of the insurance business. For example, the insurer QBE Asia has “started seeing benefits from integrated AI systems that streamline and automate our claims workflow and reduce costs by consolidating the underwriting processes on a centralized platform”. They also deploy Robotic Process Automation to save significant costs on repetitive non-value adding tasks and have started to actively integrate connected devices (Internet of Things, IoT) into their insurance processes.

Finally, public authorities are likely to modify and adapt regulations in reaction to the development of digital insurance and insurtechs

According to Bain, “digital disruption is getting a push from regulators. In Singapore, Hong Kong and, more recently, Indonesia, authorities are actively promoting digital innovation and have established government funded incubators, known locally as sandboxes, to encourage insurers to experiment with new technologies”. Singapore and Hong Kong are emerging as hubs for telematics and insurtechs, and consumer use of digital channels in those markets is growing rapidly. This means new regulations are likely to be put in place, and insurtechs should prepare for this risk.


Le Corporate Venture Capital dans la bancassurance #VC

La bancassurance est parmi les secteurs les plus actifs dans le CVC au niveau mondial…

Alors que le Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) est en plein développement à l’échelle mondiale, comme indiqué par le dernier rapport CB Insights sur le sujet, le secteur de la bancassurance se confirme comme une des références, dans le monde comme en France.

En effet, si on examine les principaux investisseurs CVC dans le monde, on remarque la présence de nombreux acteurs des industries financières, comme Goldman Sachs et Fidelity, tandis que des entreprises étrangères dans ce secteur, comme SoftBank et Alibaba, investissent des montants considérables dans les services financiers.

…. et impliquant principalement des investissement en fintech ou insurtech, tout en s'intéressant également à des secteurs non financiers

Les fintechs et autres startups liées à la finance restent une priorité pour la plus grande partie des banques. Comme l'indique le graphique ci-dessous, les principales institutions financières américaines ont grandement augmenté le nombre d'investissements dans des start up dans les innovations financières. Néanmoins, des organisations financières comme Goldman Sachs ou des AM comme Fidelity n'hésitent pas à investir dans des startups diverses, allant de la santé aux médias. Par exemple, en 2020 Citi Ventures a mis en place un fonds d'investissement de 150 millions de dollars dédié à l'impact investing.

Cela est également visible en France, avec une transition graduelle vers des portefeuilles de plus en plus généralistes, même si la stratégie pour la plupart des acteurs semble toujours clairement ancrée sur leurs métiers historiques. Par exemple, au sein du portfolio de SG Ventures (l’entité d’investissement en capital-risque de la Société Générale), toutes les startups sont liées soit à l’assurance, soit à la banque soit à la mobilité, qui est l’une des activités de la Société Générale à travers sa filiale ALD.

En France également, les entreprises de services financiers sont les moteurs du CVC, et s’organisent selon deux modalités principales

Les acteurs de la banque et de l’assurance sont parmi les plus actifs de l'écosystème CVC en France, et représentent une proportion importante des investissements corporate dans des startups innovantes. Leurs objectifs sont à la fois stratégiques, mais aussi financiers, et leurs investissements, initialement centrés uniquement sur leur cœur de métier, ont tendance à se diversifier de plus en plus.

Les sociétés du secteur de l'assurance sont les acteurs les plus prolifiques du paysage CVC hexagonal. De même, les banques françaises sont relativement actives dans le secteur du corporate venture capital. Certaines d'entre elles sont d'ailleurs parmi les principaux investisseurs en France. Par exemple, en 2017 le Crédit Agricole était troisième, à égalité avec Partech, un des principaux fonds de venture capital en Europe. Certaines banques ont été particulièrement précoces et pro-actives dans leur stratégie de financement de l'innovation, et il existe une hétérogénéité importante dans les montants investis et la diversité des portefeuilles.

Investissements réalisés par différents groupes bancaires français (avant 2017)


Le positionnement unique de Mandalore Partners:

Venture capital as a service : a new state of play

It’s an exciting time to be a gamer, game developer, entrepreneurial gaming leader, and an investor. Over the last few years, gaming has exploded to a $152bn+ industry and is forecast to double to $300bn by 2025, growing larger than the NFL, NBA, music streaming, and worldwide box office combined. Investors have poured over $60 billion of VC funding into gaming ventures. Recent ventures that joined the unicorn club include Game 24×7, Immutable, and Tripedot.

Venture dollars have followed, especially in Europe. In the past 5 years, venture capital investment within the gaming sector in Europe has risen from $636m in 2014 to $1.3 billion in 2021. 25% to 30% of all VC investments in gaming were made in Europe.

Gaming is just one of the tech industries that have emerged with the power of digital. Consider SustainabilityTech, ImmersiveTech, and Web3.0 or cyber security platforms.

With so many new tech sectors emerging, there have never been more sources of funding for startups than there are today. The very best early-stage companies have many options when it comes to financing their business — whether it’s angel funding, crowdsourced funding, accelerator funding, or venture funding provided.

Within the venture capital industry, traditional venture capital firms typically write the biggest cheques as they hold significant resources to support start-ups within their networks. Still, traditional venture capital firms may or may not have the knowledge and expertise to bring their portfolio companies more than financing, meaning negotiating also strategic corporate partnerships to support sustainable sources of growth.

If start-ups are mainly focused on how they can scale their business, then they can look to local and multinational corporations for funding and partnership opportunities. Some of these corporations such as Intel or Google have their own corporate venture capital funds for this purpose. The benefit of this option is that startup businesses can usually secure both strategic partnerships and the capital they seek.

However, there may be a downside if this relationship limits your flexibility to partner with other companies. Some young businesses look at these partnerships as a potential future exit strategy, while corporations may look at minority equity ownership as a test for future majority ownership stakes.

What is Venture Capital as a Service?

New companies create constant pressure that disrupts established ways of doing business, with the average business lifespan on the S&P 500 collapsing by nearly 70% since the 1960s.

In addition, these emerging tech players also have lots of options when it comes to getting funded. I’m not saying that VC is going anywhere, but it’s important to realize that the playing field has changed. In the past, new businesses needed VCs more than VCs needed new businesses. But with the rise of corporate VCs, angels, and crowdfunding, that is no longer the case. small businesses now have more options when it comes to financing.

Consider the corporate venture capital world of today. It is the corporate venture arm of a corporation that makes equity investments in startups, usually with the intention of generating a financial return and/or achieving strategic objectives. Corporate VCs can be either internal (a division of the corporation) or external (an independent VC firm funded by the corporation).

External corporate VCs are often used as a tool to access startup innovation and to build relationships with startups that can be leveraged by the corporation. Internal corporate VCs, on the other hand, are often used as a tool to generate a financial return for the corporation.

Still, as a way to address the emerging market dynamics for startups and corporations, a new venture capital business model has emerged. This model, known as Venture Capital-as-a-Service (VCaaS), provides an optimal mix of capital and business value to startups and corporations by combining strategic alignment, goal-based sourcing, and access to networks of corporate funds.

Firms including Touchdown Ventures and Pegasus Tech Ventures are providing startups with both flexible cheque sizes and targeted business engagements with strategic corporate partners. Touchdown has partnered with corporations such as Aramark, Kelloggs, T-Mobile and 20th Century Fox. Pegasus has partnered with corporations including ASUS, acer and SEGA.

Indeed, incumbent market players can use venture capitalist thinking to plan their market disruptions, evaluate insight to draw strategies, inform corporate strategy and minimize surprises from an impact and financial returns viewpoint — turning venturing into a profit center instead of a cost center by managing, investing, and partnering with portfolio companies.

There are many benefits the venture capital as a service model can provide. First, it allows you to access leading-edge thinking and high-growth potential innovations and to build relationships with tech-led businesses that can be directly deployed by the corporation. Second, it allows you to generate a financial return for the corporation. Third, it allows you to access venture capital thinking and expertise to inform your own corporate strategy. Finally, it helps you minimize surprises from an impact and financial returns viewpoint.

There are also some risks associated with venture capital as a service. First, if you are not careful, it can lead to a conflict of interest between the corporation and the venture capital firm. Second, it can be difficult to find a venture capital firm that is a good fit for your corporation. Third, the venture capital firm may not be able to generate the expected return on investment. Finally, the venture capital firm may not be able to provide the desired level of service.

The three models of Venture Capital funding

There are a few models currently deployed by organizations when it comes to venture capital funding that also leverage a corporation.

Firstly, corporations can choose to directly manage their Corporate Venture Fund or Do It Themselves. This has been the more “traditional” strategy, initially adopted by most major actors, from Google to Axa. It entails significant commitments, in terms of both financial, human, and organizational resources: internal teams and processes have to be set up from scratch, and venture money has to be actively monitored and managed. Our Venture capitalists’ service enables our clients to tailor very specific tech investment thesis and secure their operations with minimum resource involvement to accessing qualified deal flow as well as expensive and sophisticated back-office resources.

Secondly, there is capital investment in independent venture capital funds. This more passive venture capital funding approach requires less corporate commitment and resources, but it also leads to minimal mandate control, limited co-investing opportunities, a closed-end fund structure, and no investment committee participation.

We can clearly see there are advantages and significant downsides to both of these approaches. This is why there is now a more active and strategic alternative participative funding option.

As a financially optimized model, Venture Capital as a Service (VCaaS) can be a fully outsourced service, or it can be a platform providing organizations with the opportunity to complement existing or build new, in-house venture capitalist capabilities. VCaaS delivers financial and strategic returns, as well as scale, context, and focus for corporates, government organizations & family offices.

What are good examples of venture Capital Funds? 

Multiple major corporations have put in place a comprehensive venture capital strategy in the past few years. As noted above both Touchdown Ventures and Pegasus Tech Ventures are well known in the nonfinance sector with respectively 63 and 175 portfolio companies.

The ultimate goal is to accelerate the success of portfolio companies by connecting them to networks of multinational corporate partners to create opportunities for business development, manufacturing, distribution, and global expansion. Some of the core capabilities these corporate venture capitalist arms have bespoke and industrialized for corporations include:

  • Distribution deals focus on using existing and new social channels to bring new products and services to customers.

  • Co-marketing typically involves bundling corporate and startup product messages to potential customers who would be interested in the joint offer.

  • Vendor agreement structuring where one party buys from another. Corporations can purchase products or services from startups, or startups can buy from corporations too.

  • Supply chain collaborations generally allow startups to leverage the scale, experience, and relationships of larger corporations.

  • Licensing transactions can focus on sharing technology know-how, patents, or other forms of intellectual property, including content.

The insurance industry has also been dynamic with a few leading re/insurers leading the pack. Still much more can be done in the sector.

  1. AXA Venture Partners

With $1 billion of assets under management. Axa Venture Partners has been one of the pioneers of corporate venture capital in Europe, launching AXA Venture Partners in 2015 with a focus on seed and early-stage funding opportunities in Europe, US and Canada, Israel, and the Mena region. Unicorns include Blockstream and Phenom.

  1. MunichRe Ventures

Launched in 2015, Munich Re Ventures is an extremely active and respected corporate venture fund that counts seven unicorns, 2 IPOs, and 5 acquisitions. The fund has taken a diversified portfolio approach investing in tech companies in finance, insurance, enterprise technology, transport and logistics, aerospace, and environment tech among the few.

  1. Generali and Inco Ventures:

Designed in partnership with INCO Ventures, a pioneer in impact investing, Generali launched in November 2020 the Generali Impact Investment fund. Reserved for institutional investors, this fund aims to financially support the growth of companies and organizations that contribute to improving the lives of the most vulnerable families and the professional integration of refugees. Generali France has thus taken a new step in its responsible investment strategy, in favor of more inclusive and more sustainable savings. The fund is committed for 20 years to an ambitious approach to Corporate Social Responsibility.

Most corporations do not have one single fund. To diversify portfolio strategy and ensure that they cover a variety of aspects across their value chains, they seek expertise from a variety of venture capitalists and startup commercialization experts.

Why should corporations outsource their Venture Capital arm?

In the 1980s and ’90s, many U.S.-based companies outsourced their research and development activities to Asia to reduce costs and secure the technical talent required to meet the growing demand for new digital products and services. With new remote working demands and talent scarcity, there is a need to access structure competence more readily within countries. Diversifying the talent pool has helped American companies to hedge risk and remain innovative. Overall, these U.S.-based companies performed better and drove higher profit margins, often leading the world across a variety of sectors.

The innovative models

A few VC firms have developed innovative models such as venture-capital as-a-service (VCaaS) as a way to support corporates to modernize and industrialize their innovation activities. They help corporations manage their corporate venture capital funds and find the most innovative startups to invest in, based on their interest areas. The firms also help facilitate startup relationships, developing business and technology collaboration. In many cases, corporations learn about new technology trends, new business models, and best practices from these startups–helping the corporations remain innovative. Startups in this model benefit from access to decision-makers, business guidance, and potentially a new revenue stream.

A venture capital firm: Innotech Corporation

As one of the best-funded venture-backed companies, and a smart automation provider, Osaro, successfully leveraged the opportunities offered by VCaaS and received funding from  Innotech Corporation.

Partnering with Innotech Corporation and Pegasus Tech Ventures has been critical for our international business expansion as well as for funding across multiple rounds of financing. We look forward to continuing our growth together and highly recommend that fellow entrepreneurs establish similar win-win relationships between investors and corporations.

Derik Pridmore, CEO of Osaro.

Indeed, startups often lack the scale, expertise, and experience needed to quickly grow to new markets and segments. As emphasized by Venturebeat, this makes effective partnerships with experienced corporations all the more important:

As our world becomes more connected than ever, it has become easier for startups to expand their businesses into fast-growing markets abroad. Yet, in many circumstances they still need the right partner in order to do so.

Venture capitalists outsource corporate innovation

Outsourcing corporate innovation using VCaaS is a new way to address the ever-growing need of corporates to reinvent their business models. The approach relies on the expertise of angel investors, institutional investors, and corporate investors instead of relying solely on internal resources. VC firms that operate using this model are coming up with creative and flexible strategies that allow any corporation (large or small) to take advantage of corporate venturing thinking and invest in innovation. Outsourcing the investor’s expertise allows companies to run and grow their corporate venturing programs, generating top-tier results while keeping costs under control.

To sum up, both corporate firms and startups benefit from a VCaaS configuration. It’s a win-win framework for both sides as commercial engagements and decision-making are de-risked for all parties.

De-risking corporate innovation

There are two ways we look at de-risking the corporate venture capitalist conundrum.

For corporations: 

The framework allows for quick access to the VC’s network and deal-flow without having to start from scratch. It also eases access to a less expensive solution to in-house R&D to find new technologies and products. Working with the right venture capital firms, corporations benefit from an all-in-one solution with a competitive management fee–all for a fraction of the cost of typical R&D programs.

Corporates can also an innovation strategy without being hindered by the inertia and bureaucracy that is often present in very large firms.

For startups: 

The framework also facilitates easy access to long-term partnerships with established actors in their market. Indeed, the latter entails collaborations with firms that can help corporations quickly enter new markets and offers a potential new avenue to achieve a successful exit (e.g by being acquired by the corporation for instance.)

A young but growing practice

While VCaaS is a young, still fast-growing practice, several actors have already built a strong reputation and track record. As noted before, two of the well-established venture capital firms enabling corporate venturing include Pegasus Tech Ventures in Silicon Valley and Touchdown Ventures in Los Angeles. This means partnering with leading global corporations from Kellog’s to T-Mobile with clear gaps across their innovation value chain and supporting them in shaping and scaling activities enabling them to achieve their long-term goals. Similarly, Mandalore Partners, based in Paris, is working with leading insurance firms to help them put in place their venture capital investment thesis to start to benefit from the strategic and financial returns resulting from well-structured VCas a Service funds. From ideation to exits, we provide access to the resources and expertise you need to build a successful venture portfolio.

Roadmap for success

For us, success comes from quickly identifying growth ventures that fit within the strategic roadmap of corporate partners. After the VC introduces corporations to top emerging entrants, they work together to create joint development and revenue opportunities. Partnerships like this are mutually beneficial, leading to corporate innovation initiatives and helping startups scale their business faster.

VC money can drive many opportunities. What if you don’t have the time or resources to source and diligence these deals? Maybe you’re an entrepreneur who wants to raise money for your startup but doesn’t know where to start. Or maybe you’re an established business that needs access to future lens innovative thinking and wants to tap into the startup ecosystem but doesn’t have the know-how. This is where VC as a service comes in. We are a new breed of VC that provides not just capital, but also expertise, resources, and networks to help future-focused corporations and growth ventures succeed. Let’s not just write cheques. Let’s write success stories.

Don’t forget to listen to…

Sabine and I discussed VC as a Service recently on her podcast #scoutingforgrowth. You can find the discussion and episode just here.

About Minh Q. Tran

Founder & Managing Partner Mandalore Partners

Minh is the founder and managing partner of Mandalore Partners, which created an innovative framework that enables investors of early-stage companies to achieve scale by being exposed to a range of traditional, alternative, and tech venture capital assets.

In addition to his experience as one of the founding team members at AXA Strategic Ventures, Minh was also an integral part of several other VC firms, including Nokia Ventures, Bertelsmann Ventures, and Truffle Capital.

Minh is also a co-founder of Alchemy Crew where he works closely with Sabine VanderLinden to refine the corporate-startup engagement model through commercialization execution.

Twitter – Linkedinminh@mandalorepartners.com

Photo by Jonathan Pielmayer on Unsplash

VC-as-a-Service: Benchmark of the sector & Strategic Positioning of Mandalore Partners #VC #VCaaS

Venture capital (VC) is a form of investment for early-stage, innovative businesses with strong growth potential. Often led by funds, Venture Capital investments are not for the faint of heart.

However, VC investments can be a fully outsourced service build new, in-house VC capabilities for Corporations, family offices or Business Angels. Known as VC-as-a-Service, the demand for such a service is booming.

Why ?

Corporate venture capital (CVC) is the investment of corporate funds directly in external startup companies.

CVC is beneficial for corporations for two aspects:

  • From a strategic point of view, CVC represents a true external source of innovation and enables an active monitoring of the sector’s future evolutions for corporations. CVC is also allowing corporations to attract the best profiles willing to work in a dynamic environment.

  • From a financial perspective, CVC often leads to return on investment. As for classical VC investment, CVC investments are generally characterized as very high-risk/high-return opportunities.

CVC is also a great opportunity for start-ups. More than getting only financial resources like with VC funds, they can get the optimal mix of capital and business value from the corporations. Indeed, start-ups have access to the fund’s financial expertise but also to the corporations’ knowledge about the sector.

Thus, CVC is a win-win solution for both corporations and start-ups. However, this solution is hard to implement in real life.

Indeed, VC abilities requires a lot of time, resources, contacts in the start-up ecosystem to have access to a strong deal flow, expertise for deep innovative analysis, expertise about legal aspects of VC investments. Corporations do not always have all those assets in-house.

Moreover, a misalignment of purposes can rise between the financial and strategic department of a large corporations due to the high-risk nature of VC investments. Besides, once the investment done, the gap between conservative mindsets in corporations and agile ones in start-ups may not be profit holder for both.

As CVC is very hard to implement, one may wonder on the way to deal with it.

How ?

Many actors are offering external services to enable corporations to have access to VC abilities for investments.

Each actor offers VC-as-a-Service abilities, some are pure players like Touchdown Ventures, some are bringing also a consulting expertise like McKinsey and Mandalore Partners is bringing a Digital Ecosystem along with its VC abilities.

There are three different categories of actors offering VC-as-a-Service abilities.

  • Pure players like Touchdown Ventures. Among this category, pure players are often multi-sector oriented and operate at a local scale like Techmind or at a global scale like Pegasus Ventures.

  • Consulting groups like Bain are bringing along their CVC abilities some of their consulting expertise. They operate at a global scale and on many sectors but mostly digital ones (TMT).

  • Mandalore Partners is a pure player but also brings its Digital Ecosystem along with its VC abilities. Mandalore has a global expertise and is specialized in Insurtech.

What ?

The objective of VC-as-a-Service is to bring VC abilities to corporations and start-ups:

Sourcing is one of the hardest abilities to acquire when a corporation wants to acquire VC skills. Indeed, it requires a lot of time and relations to build an efficient network. Using VC-as-a-Service gives corporations access to top-notch deals. VC-as-a-Service also quickly identify startups that fit within the strategic roadmap of the corporate partners thanks to previous deals and accumulated experiences.

More than Sourcing, VC-as-a-Service also brings a structure and a platform to rely on. Indeed, VC-as-a-Service funds have financial expertise, fine knowledge of the sector and contacts to find the best diligence as possible.

An efficient CVC investment is not finished when the start-up has received the funds from the company. VC-as-a-Service funds also follows the portfolio of the company and helps the start-up in its future milestone.

Using a VC-as-a-Service fund is in fact time saving and cost effective. It only takes few weeks to launch and to follow a CVC strategy for a corporation.

All along the investment process, decisions are made by the corporate which is enlighten by VC-as-a-Service fund. The fund is not making any investment alone.

Le CVC, un secteur en pleine expansion

D'après l’article paru sur TechCrunch en mars 2022. 


Le boom d’investissements en capital risque qui a marqué l’année 2021 n’a pas été uniquement le fait de fonds en capital risque traditionnels. En effet, d’autres acteurs et sources de capital ont joué un rôle clé: des nouvelles méthodes d’investissements angel et seed, jusqu’à des fonds crossover qui soutiennent des startups late stage. Et au milieu de toute cette activité frénétique et des levées records, les investisseurs corporate ont continué à développer leurs importance au sein du paysage VC. 

Corporate Venture Capital (CVC) est la méthode par laquelle des entreprises mettent en place leur propre structure d’investissement. Traditionnellement, cette démarche unit des objectifs stratégiques (M&A, accès à la technologie, partenariats) et financiers (retours sur investissement). La pondération de chacun varie en fonction de l’entreprise et du développement de leurs équipes CVC, mais il est rare de trouver des CVC qui n’ont qu’un de ces objectifs. Cela fait de leurs investissements un intéressant mélange d’investissement en capital risque classique et action stratégique de l’entreprise. Du point de vue des startups, le CVC est également très attractif. Par exemple, cela leur permet de s’adosser à un partenaire expérimenté, et donc de bénéficier de ses ressources, réseaux et expériences. La perspective d'être potentiellement racheté par le corporate offre également une sortie attrayante pour les entrepreneurs et les investisseurs. 


Les CVCs étaient exceptionnellement actifs l’année dernière, et il n’y a jamais eu autant d’acteurs. Si on analyse les données publiées par CB Insights, il est clair que 2021 fut une année charnière pour ce secteur, avec des records battus dans la plupart des indicateurs. Les CVC sont également de plus en plus présents au sein de l’espace médiatique. Par exemple, MondoDB, une startup de codage qui a fait son introduction en bourse il y a cinq ans, a mis en place son propre fond. MondoDB et d’autres startups à succès comme Coinbase sont intéressantes car elles sont actives dans le CVC avant même d’atteindre le statut d’entreprise mature et établie. Cette dynamique ne s'arrête pas là, et le CVC n’est désormais plus cantonné à une poignée de multinationales comme Axa et General Electric. Maintenant, même des entreprises privées plus petites s’y mettent, ce qui met en évidence à la fois les délais de plus en plus larges avant les IPOs, et l’abondance de fonds disponibles pour être utilisés en VC. 


Examinons maintenant les données du secteur de manière plus précise. Il y a deux indicateurs principaux pour examiner l'évolution du secteur. Tout d’abord, le nombre et la rapidité avec laquelle de nouveaux CVC sont mis en place, et le rythme auquel ceux déjà existants investissent. Si on examine le premier indicateur, il est clair que nous assistons, ces dernières années, à une expansion sans précédent du secteur. Selon CB Insights, il y a eu 221 nouvelles structures CVC, un chiffre en augmentation de 53% par rapport à 2020. Néanmoins, ce chiffre reste légèrement en deçà de l’augmentation en 2018, qui était de 259. 2021 reste tout de même la deuxième année en termes de créations depuis que nous avons des données sur les CVC. 


Une expansion rapide, ainsi que des acteurs diversifiés


Serge Tanjga, Senior Vice President chez MongoDB, remarque que, d’un point de vue technologique, les entreprises tech plus matures “mettent en place des équipes CVC car ils ont des capitaux en surplus à allouer, et parce qu'être un acteur VC aidera le positionnement de leur marque”, tandis que les entreprises tech plus jeunes “ ont tendance à lancer leur CVC pour attirer des startups qui puissent aider à aider à développer leurs produits, pour financer leurs clients existants ou supercharge des partenariats go-to-market”. Quand on analyse combien de CVCs sont mis en place, il est donc important de toujours se rappeler que ce secteur n’est pas un monolithe uniforme, mais au contraire ses acteurs ont une diversité d’objectifs. 


Il est difficile de déterminer quels types de CVC sont le plus représentés parmi le haut niveau de créations l’année dernière. Mais si on part du principe que la nouvelle “promotion” d’acteurs CVC est similaire à ses prédécesseurs, on peut prédire qu’un nombre important de fonds ont été lancés à la fois avec l’objectif “returns-first” et “strategy-first”. Si on s’interesse également aux montants investis par les CVC, on constate également une expansion constante ces dernières années, comme l’indique l’image ci-dessous, produite par CB Insights. 



Pour les startups, cela signifie que leurs options de financement sont non seulement plus larges, mais aussi que le segment “corporate” du marché est plus profond que jamais. Il est donc probable que les partenariats et investissements corporate-startup sont voués à continuer leur développement, et à concerner un segment d’entreprises de plus en plus large et varié.

Original Article:

The venture capital boom of 2021 was not built from merely traditional VC money. A host of other capital sources played a role in the global trend, from new methods of disbursing angel and seed capital to crossover funds pouring into late-stage startups. And amid all the noise, record-setting totals, and rapid-fire dealmaking, corporate venture investors were busy, investing gobs of parent-company cash into far-smaller concerns.

 

Corporate venture capital, or CVC for short, is the method by which wealthy businesses build their own investing arm. Traditionally, these efforts blend strategic goals (M&A, early access to technology, partnerships) and financial ones (returns). The exact mix varies by company and CVC effort, but it’s rare to find a corporate venture concern that has none of one or the other. This makes their investing an interesting blend of traditional venture and corporate opportunism.

CVCs were busy last year. New data from CB Insights makes it clear that 2021 was a colossal period for CVCs, an all-time record by some metrics and a near-record year by others. CVCs are in the news lately as well, thanks to MongoDB – a NoSQL company that went public in 2017 – putting together its own fund, an event that the technology world took note of. MongoDB joins recently public companies like Coinbase in employing corporate investor work before reaching mega-cap status. The trend goes further: We’ve even seen private companies launch their own CVCs, evidence at once of the lengthening period in which high-growth tech startups stay private and the sheer amount of capital available to pre-IPO companies.

 

Today, we’re exploring the data behind 2021’s CVC investing boom with commentary from Serge Tanjga, SVP Finance at MongoDB. Tomorrow, we’ll dive into the hows and whys of CVC in the current venture climate with commentary from a number of corporate investing players — and even one public company that is choosing to not build its own investing arm. Sounds good? Let’s get into the data.

 

How quickly is corporate venture capital investment accelerating?

There are two ways to track the growth of corporate venture capital: The pace at which new CVC concerns are set up, and the rate at which the larger CVC segment invests.

We’ll take them in order. It’s clear that more CVCs are being compiled in the current market than nearly ever before. Indeed, CB Insights data indicates that some 221 new CVCs were created in 2021, a huge 53% increase on 2020 data. However, the 2021 result was actually fractionally lower than the 259 built in 2018. That said, 2021 was the second-hottest year for which we have data when it came to new CVCs reaching the market.

 

Tanjga, discussing the CVC market from a technology perspective, said that more mature tech companies “tend to set up CVC arms because they have excess capital to deploy, or because being in the VC space will help with their brand positioning,” while younger technology companies “tend to start CVC efforts to attract startups to build on their product, to fund their existing customers or supercharge go-to-market partnerships.” So when we discuss just how many CVCs are being built, keep in mind that they are not a monolith when it comes to goals.

 

We can’t tease out a perfect split of CVC focus from the pace at which new funds were put to market last year. But if we presume that the new crop of corporate venture players is similar to those that came before it, it is safe to infer that a good number of returns-first and strategy-first CVCs were launched in 2021. For startups, that means that their set of capital funding options is not only broader than ever, but also that the corporate portion of the market is deeper than ever.

Why do we care?